Characteristics of Post-Literacy

“If the ideal of communication is a meeting of souls,
then writing is a sad shadow of the ideal.”

James Gleick, The Information (2011)

If we can agree that post-literacy is a positive development and not a decline into some sort of anti-intellectual wasteland, then we need to consider what would it be like. What are the characteristics of a post-literate world?

Replacing or displacing reading and writing will not be easy. This difficulty will not come from resistance of people to letting go but rather in finding a capacity or capability which is sufficiently powerful to perform better than literacy. Of the many characteristics a post-literate capability must have, the principle one is that it must be advantageous. Anything less than an advantage over literacy will result in its failure. Any capacity that does not bring with it new opportunities and new options while still preserving some, but not all, of literacy’s benefits will not endure.

What is it about literacy that we value? While we believe that post-literacy will bring opportunities beyond those provided by reading and writing, there are characteristics of literacy that have made it tremendously successful and that must likely survive in a post-literate world.

Visible language has excelled in two almost contradictory characteristics: the ability to achieve clarity and precision, and the capacity to be expressive, evocative, and nuanced. This combination of the factual and the metaphorical is a great source of literacy’s power and influence. It can tell you something or it can merely suggest something. It can bring something into focus in such a way as to further your knowledge or it can deliberately introduce imprecision or confusion in order to stimulate a new awareness or dispel an old idea. Writing has a plasticity allowing it to mold itself for diverse purposes.

Reading is often described as an all encompassing, trance-like experience. Being “taken away” to another world or time is part of the pleasure and advantage of literacy. As neurologist Jeff Zacks has observed “reading itself is a powerful kind of virtual reality” (“Reading Create ‘Simulations’ in Minds”, 2009) When you read your brain mingles what you are reading with all your past experiences, memories, and tactile responses. Reading is a complex integration of the text, your own history, and the simulations your brain creates for you. The immersive nature of reading is profound and important. In part this is why reading is so addictive. Post-literacy must enable this; it must provide a complex and sophisticated virtual world that is both presented to us (by the author or creator) and that mingles with our own inner world (our memories and imagination).

With immersion also comes the ability to reflect. Reading is a measured experience. The reader can stop, re-read, jump ahead, and even make notes (reading the marginalia of others is an interesting pursuit in itself. For more on this see H.J. Jackson’s Marginalia: Readers Writing in Books, 2001). Unlike many media, video for example, the reader is in charge of their own experience. We process reading differently than we process images or sound. The result is a more contemplative experience. While transported, we are also in control. We are not simply experiencing the text we are actively reflecting on it and contributing to it through our imagination and critical assessment. In part this is because the pace of reading is, by comparison with other media, slow. This opportunity for reflection, contemplation, and extension makes reading a more compelling, integrative experience.

An obvious benefit of writing over orality is the ability of ideas (through texts) to persist over time and space. Literacy creates the possibility of an historical perspective; it presents time as linear, and events as sequential and fixed (true). Libraries are possible because of the persistence of texts. Study, comparison, dialogue, and debate are all possible across the ages because the texts allow us to commune with the great minds of the past or simply anyone who was able to record their thoughts. Spoken words are uttered and then dissolve into the air; the written word can endure for future use and reflection. Persistence is a preeminent benefit.

Writing is not just a recording of facts. Reading is not just decoding symbols. Reading and writing are a means to understand and a way to provide understanding. Texts are a forum where the author can persuade, influence, cajole, and reprimand. It is a place where the reader seeks help, insight, and support. Writing provides a conversation and an informed discourse where there is opportunity for interchange and growth. While reading is a personal act, reading creates communities of like minds. Reading is an isolated activity but it is part of a communal experience of the text. We can understand each other and share ideas with each other because we have read the same books. The books we read allow us to build individual identities at the same time the collective experience builds a community of common ideas and values. In this sense reading and writing construct a key part of the social fabric upon which we rely to bring meaning to our communities and our individual lives.

Patrick Tucker in “The Dawn of the Postliterate Age” (2009) reinforces the primary characteristic of post-literacy, that it be advantageous:

“If written language is merely a technology for transferring information, then it can and should be replaced by a newer technology that performs the same function more fully and effectively. But it’s up to us, as the consumers and producers of technology, to insist that the would-be replacement demonstrate authentic superiority.”

His faith in “consumers and producers” to act in the best interests of each other may be misplaced. Other motives may well influence the emergence of a post-literate capacity. And the superiority of whatever that capacity is may not be apparent in the early stages of its evolution (as was the case with early writing). However, Tucker concludes with a strident challenge that is intellectually and emotionally jarring. We must, he says, demand “proof that illiteracy … will improve people’s lives.”

These characteristics and these concerns are illustrative of why reading and writing will not be easily displaced. Literacy is deeply beneficial and highly addictive. It has become a cornerstone of our societies and our civilizations. And yet it has limitations which seriously undermine its ability to continue to be a dominate form of human communication. Literacy has fatal flaws and other developments promise to open up a new possibilities for human ideas and knowledge. That is the focus of the next few chapters of this project.


8 Responses to “Characteristics of Post-Literacy”

  1. John Miedema October 29, 2012 at 9:03 pm #

    There’s a new invention called television that sounds like what you are talking about. I bet it will do the trick!

    See The Ten Commandments of Television According to Moses Znaimer. E.g., #2, “PRINT CREATED ILLITERACY. TV IS DEMOCRATIC. EVERYBODY GETS IT.”

  2. John Miedema October 29, 2012 at 9:13 pm #

    Kidding aside, I think this is a good start on a chapter that needs further development as a necessary prelude to chapter 9, a solid review of the meaning of knowledge. See my comment on chapter 9.

  3. Aimee May 7, 2013 at 2:10 am #

    “Writing provides a conversation and an informed discourse where there is opportunity for interchange and growth.”

    This quote seems in opposition to another musing, “written words: they seem to talk to you as though they were intelligent, but if you ask them anything about what they say, from a desire to be instructed, they go on saying the same thing forever […] doesn’t know how to address the right people, and not address the wrong” from Plato speaking through Socrates. While this section has commented about But Plato never saw a blog or a Facebook wall where the text is flexible and can be added to, edited, deleted, duplicated, shared, and the author can comment in the conversation. Despite the fact that writing (and reading) separates (Ong 2001) post literacy is beginning to unite and spark the conversation and revive dead discourse. Ong argues not only that writing separates but also that there is a division between orality and literacy but new medias, and the future of post literacy, are bridging the great divide.
    The new medias of post literacy seem to be shifting literacy back into the oral with the advancements of video and auditory instruments. Enhanced distribution hubs such as YouTube, Facebook, TedTalks, and Pintrest are gearing more towards visual literacy and videos, deepening a foundation in orality and oral culture. I know friends that prefer audio books to reading and Skype brings communication back to speech (visual) and context. Heath defines literacy events as “occasions in which written language is integral to the nature of participants’ interactions and their interpretive processes and strategies”(1982 50). What will the characteristics of post-literacy events look like? Will “written language” be replaced by new a technology literacy, or even a revert back to the oral?


    Heath, Shirley Brice. “What No Bedtime Story Means: Narrative Skills at Home and School.” Language and Society, 11 (1982) 49-76.

    Ong, Walter. Ellen Cushman, ed. “Writing as a Technology That Restructures Thought.” Literacy: A Critical Sourcebook. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2001. 19- 31. Print.

    Plato, R. Hackforth, ed. Plato: Phaedrus. Cambridge: University Press, 1952. Print.

  4. Adriana May 7, 2013 at 1:03 pm #

    I found the discussion on the traits and powers of visible language to be very intriguing. Visible language does hold characteristics that other mediums are not designed to convey. Ridley writes above that, “Visible language has excelled in two almost contradictory characteristics: the ability to achieve clarity and precision, and the capacity to be expressive, evocative, and nuanced.” The ability of handwriting to perpetuate uniformity as well as express uniqueness is inherent in the medium. In Tamara Plakins Thorton’s essay “The Lost World of Colonial Handwriting,” she argues that the expressiveness of handwriting could speak volumes about a person’s socioeconomic background. Thorton writes:
    The very style in which one formed letters was also determined by one’s place in society and therefore acted as a third mechanism of controlling the social and cultural meanings attached to writing literacy, (62).
    In this moment, Thorton explains that although handwriting was established to create a uniform communication system that everyone could understand, the way in which it was executed provided information that differentiated the writer’s social class and continued the established class system. In this way, handwriting is more expressive and nuanced than the printed word could ever be. Although there are numerous fonts and styles of printed text, there is no way it can compare to the highly communicative act of handwriting.

  5. Adriana May 7, 2013 at 1:04 pm #

    One power that both printed word and handwriting have which post-literacy must find a way to harness is the ability to reflect. Reading and writing have the power to present an idea to a reader and encourage them to do something with it. The notion of true reflection derived from a literary experience can be seen in The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass; he writes, “[Books] gave tongue to interesting thoughts of my own soul, which had frequently flashed through my mind, and died away for want of utterance,” (34-35). As Douglass explains, he had thought many similar ideas to the ones he found in published books, but because no one had ever reaffirmed them he did not dwell on them. The moment he could intellectually interact with others, even if only through the written word, he became reflective. This is one power that I believe inherent to reading and writing, but if it can be harnessed by post-literacy then it should be.

    • Michael Ridley May 13, 2013 at 10:33 am #

      Good point; reflection is essential. However, the alphabet (and other writing systems) don’t create reflection they simply enable it. Written words are the catalyst for us to reflect but not the reflection itself. I agree that a post-literate capacity must enable (and significantly enhance) our ability to be reflective if it is to displace visible language. Of course (and forgive the overreaching here), maybe the intelligence machines will do some of the reflection for us. Grin.


  1. Post-Literacy: The Next Big Thing | Jordan - August 30, 2013

    […] I read the “Characteristics of Post-Literacy” chapter from the Beyond Literacy website ( , I found that I was quickly growing more accepting of this idea that we will one day reach a […]

  2. Readings and Activities for Tuesday, December 1 | English 329: Community and Literacy - December 2, 2013

    […] Characteristics of Post-Literacy Digital Literacies The New Literacy at The New Literacy Studies and Teaching Literacy (pp. 12-24)  Video recordings at newlearningonline: Watch Exploring Multiliteracies Parts 1- 3 and Moving into Multiliteracies 1-3   ACTIVITIES   We will hear several more brief reports on sites of community literacy. We have 25 minutes for group work on projects, including developing an outline for deliverable (written report) and in-class presentations […]

Leave a Reply